Wednesday, November 5, 2008

We stand today on the edge of a New Frontier

In John F. Kennedy’s acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention in 1960 he said that it was “a time for change.” These words are just as true today as they were forty-eight years ago. Kennedy was well aware of the suffering across the nation: “The old people without medical care, the families without a decent home, the parents of children without a decent school.” And in our time, we are going through an economic crisis that is costing people their homes and their jobs. Meanwhile, exit polls showed that over seventy percent of voters fear a terrorist attack. Kennedy knew of the same threats in 1960 when he said “The world has been close to war before, but now man, who’s survived all previous threats to his existence, has taken into his mortal hands the power to exterminate his species seven times over.” We live in a state of fear and we face the threat of domestic hardships as well as attacks from abroad. That is why Kennedy’s words remain true, that “Today our concern must be with the future.” And that “it is time…for a new generation of leadership.” In the past we have been a nation split by our fears and our prejudices, by our beliefs and our greed. We still see much of that split, but it is waning. Almost half a century ago Kennedy understood that “A peaceful revolution for human rights, demanding an end to racial discrimination … strained at the leashes imposed by timid executive leadership.” But we just elected a man who would not have stood the slightest chance to become President in 1960. That shows hope for this country, but we still have a long way to go. On the same day that Barack Obama was elected President, there were also three states that banned same-sex marriages. We still have many problems facing our nation. Our prejudices may be waning, but they are not gone. And the threats and problems that we face will not go away if we do nothing. Those threats will grow if they are ignored. We cannot be lulled into a belief that there is nothing left to overcome. Kennedy said “the problems are not all solved and the battles are not all won; and we stand today on the edge of a New Frontier…the frontier of unknown opportunities and perils, the frontier of unfilled hopes and unfilled threats.” As January 20, 2009 draws closer, we too stand on the edge of a new frontier. But “the New Frontier…is not a set of promises. It is a set of challenges.” Because “The New Frontier is here whether we seek it or not.” We must stand up and accept these challenges. We can stand up against discrimination based on race, gender, religious beliefs, and sexual orientation. We can stand up against those who threaten our peace and the peace of a free world. We can stand up against those who are overcome with greed and threaten the foundations of our economy. “For courage, not complacency, is our need today; leadership, not salesmanship.” That is why we had the courage to elect a new leader that shows us that there is still hope in a weary nation. And even though it was an historic event because of the color of his skin, the importance of his being elected is beyond color. It is about opportunity; opportunity to move beyond the limitations of the past and look to the possibilities of the future. “That is the question of the New Frontier. That is the choice our nation must make…between national greatness and nation decline, between the fresh air of progress and the stale, dank atmosphere of ‘normalcy’, between dedication or mediocrity.” The fight for freedom is an ongoing battle that we cannot retreat from. And this election showed that even when we are scared and our backs are against the wall, we still believe that this is a battle worth fighting.

5 comments:

Mark said...

Al Franken was also about 500 votes away from grabbing a Senate seat in Minnesota. I feel like to get any political action going in this country it needs celebrity action behind it to get it moving. Even Obama would never have been elected had he not been elevated to superstar status by a whiz-bang campaign of marketing glitz. Do we really need a slogan to believe in change? Does change need to be marketable, to be in sizable demand?

Kedar said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Kedar said...

Oops, I forgot to add a comment on my last post. I'll start over...

I was on Facebook and saw you guys posted this article. Mostly, I clicked on the link because of the name HAMradio. Not only is the name intriguing, but Ham is deliscous.

Mark, I agree with you.
Yesterday, a reporter for BBC News wrote:

"Because it is just possible that many people who voted for Mr Obama did not spend a great deal of time poring over his policy positions."

A majority of the people --mostly students-- I talked with during the campaign process did not know about Barack Obama's policies.

This was the most common response, "I just want CHANGE" Well, sure, we all want change, but what type of change is Obama proposing?

Whoever people voted is fine with me. I'm happy our country was so involved this time around. But, what worries me more, is what did/do people actually know about both candidates?

Here's the BBC article if you're interested:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7708656.stm

AK said...

I think that, because there are problems facing us whether we like it or not, it is good to see that we are not just slipping into apathy and the belief that we have no control. People voted in record numbers for this election. What we should take away from that is that we do believe in progress. We are moving forward. Our passion for what we, as a nation, believe in is not declining.
I think the fact that people vote for candidates without being aware of their policies speaks to the system we have. That it may just be a popularity contest. That the ads are short on information and big on criticism. That is what the election process has turned into. It is not that same way in other countries. Some countries have very short election campaigns and it is not just split into two candidates, but a handful of them.
There are people that are unaware of some of the policies(on either side), but maybe they chose a specific candidate for his views on gay marriage or stem cell research or whatever else. The positive side is that people care enough to make a decision. That they have a voice and they care enough to use it.

Alex said...

I love to make the comparison between JFK and Barack Obama, but at the same time it concerns me. We see the same excitement in the general public now that we once saw in 1960. People are ready for a change, and Obama helped everyone feel like they could be a part of it. He has fired up America into getting involved and trying to make a difference. He took on the challenge of guiding the country through a crisis and has gained the support of the majority of its citizens. The concern is that the people could possibly set themselves up for a major disappointment. I am concerned that the country may not be able to pull itself out of the slump that would follow if Obama gets knocked off of his pedestal. I should say that I do not in any way want this to happen, but the thought of what could happen concerns me. I have the utmost confidence in our new president, however, as I look back at history I notice that many who have fought for change have had to give their lives for the cause. Martin Luther King Jr. and John F. Kennedy are the two that carry the most relevance to what I am trying to get at. I put my confidence in the security personnel to ensure that this new voice stay protected. I put my confidence in the change that so many believe in to reach those who may disagree. I put my confidence in what my mother taught me whenever we disagreed, that I am always certainly wrong.